Florence Yozefu felt guilty for the wearing Catchmenot
while being drunk. She was so drunk that time and did not know what she was
doing that she wore Catchmenot at the wrong time and at the wrong situation.
For me, she is not right to market Catchmenot because
her experience is not enough to prove the robots ability. The robot needs
further testing. If anything went wrong, it is only Florence that should be
held responsible. Firstly, because no one forced her to use the robot, it was
her choice out of her stubbornness. Secondly, it was the first time where Catchmenot
was tested and she was not with herself so she knew nothing of how well the
robot worked.
Catchmenot is programmed to take over driving
functions of a vehicle from a human operator when it is worn by the driver.
With this, the driver needs not to be concerned of his/her route as long as the
robot knows where he is heading. This suggests that the people or driver need
not to learn how to drive because they can rely on the robots ability.
Based on Catchmenot, it may imply that artificial
intelligence may not be only limited to actions of for example robot. With the
continuous advancement of technology, it is not impossible that robots may
exhibit ethical behaviors especially when they are programmed what is right and
wrong.
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento