WHO WILL PAY THE PRICE FOR FLAWED SOFTWARE?

Peter Eflon was not wrong, because what happened was out of his control. He may have lapses for not checking immediately or not doing his final quality checks earlier. There are many possibilities why the flaw was not identified during the initial quality checks. Anyhow, what happened does not matter anymore because it already had happened. The important thing is how Peter Eflon and Cybersoft company would address this challenge especially when they are all aware of the losses suffered by other businesses due to defective software. Since, there is still a few days before the launch Peter must immediately and carefully address this problem. And if things do not go their way that they need more time Peter and Cybersoft may delay the launch but not that long. This delay would really mean loss for Cybersoft but the company would suffer more losses if they will launch and release the defective software. The release of defective software would jeopardize the company’s reputation especially when it is still launching itself to be a major Internet-based platform developer. This would cause the loss of consumer confidence on Cybersoft which suggest that the consumer would not recommend the company’s product that would lead to their downfall.